Colonist.io Player Suggestions
It could create more settlements with all that resources
It's annoying, but effective.
The bots need work, although admittedly creating perfect AI players isn't easy. But little things like building roads to nowhere should be cut out. I've played in plenty of games where bots will build in directions where there aren't any eligible places to settle while also not helping them reach Longest Road. check1) can I settle in this direction2) does this help for longest road3) does this road segment help prevent somebody from getting longest road
Is there a screenshot?
Don't necessarily agree with the suggestion for the bot in your example (although i think it should have used its last 4 roads to build toward a sheep spot or wheat port). However, i agree with the general notion that bots should not build "unnecessary" roads when they do it just to waste resources (roads to nowhere that cannot have a house on them).
Here we are with yet another game where bots just endlessly build roads, and don't build settlements, and because I actually built something I'm being largely exclusively targeted with the robbers and excessively aggressive use of knights. So I'm not able to do anything and the bots chew up all the available space on the board.
A single bot just built 12 road segments in a row, chewing up any space I had to expand, without building any settlements when it clearly could have
Bots are definitely not being 'wise' in road building. Even after a bot has the longest road (/w comfortable lead eg.+2) and is well positioned to expand (no shortage of brick/wood) it continues to build roads. The bot should instead invest in building settlements along the road, which will immediately provide a VP. It doesn't seem to matter that the bot has a pile of cards (5-6) it still builds a road instead of a settlement.
Blue is a bot:https://imgur.com/a/QXC7bgP
Hi team. Love your work!
In a recent match a bot had the chance to build a road towards a port that I was also building towards. They could have cut me off and significantly reduced my opportunities for the game. Instead the bot built a road from another settlement in an area of the board that was not closely contested.
I am guessing the bot may have been building toward a settlement location with higher production. However, it did not understand the priority of the situation, and the adva
Here's another, unrelated, bot road-building bug: there's lots of room to expand to the north from the right side of the board, but the bot just filled up space for no reason...https://imgur.com/a/UivZOq4
Sometimes bots spoils
For the fun of it I played a 2-player game against a bot with 99 max cards. After a while I noticed the bot was amassing more and more cards, so I decided to do the same ... to the effect of there being almost no cards left in the bank!!
Fun idea! The bots seem very hard coded to specific patterns and they aren't flexible/adaptable. Kind of like how the game hangs up with the bot stuck on the idea of building roads but has no roads left, or when the bot keeps building roads when it has enough resources for building a settlement or city. Or you know you can ignore a huge gap in your defenses because the bot always follows a specific growth pattern.
Bots used to build settlements and cities. They aren't anymore.
I'm also pretty sure bots' only criteria during initial placement is highest number pip total, and random when tied. That said, I've seen a number of suggestions relating to particular aspects of bot behaviour, but instead of trying to make manual tweaks, a complete overhaul would be worthwhile.
Bot at 9 points with a place to build a settlement and a hand full of cards... and it just keeps building roads. I hate that the bots cheat and collude (intentionally or not, through all having the same arcane trading rules and patterns), but there are many games where the bot just doesn't end it with obvious wins.
"Bots are only building roads" (suggested by svn on 2020-07-05), including upvotes (2) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
"BOTS broken, they don't know how to win when they clearly would (road building bug)" (suggested by John on 2020-07-16), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
"Bot seems to be completely unsure of how to win" (suggested by Chris on 2020-06-27), including upvotes (2) and comments (1), was merged into this suggestion.
"Improve bot difficulty" (suggested by Reinato on 2020-06-18), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
"Improvement to bot road placement priorities" (suggested by Jarrod on 2020-05-21), including upvotes (3) and comments (1), was merged into this suggestion.
"fix your road spam bug already." (suggested by player on 2020-03-28), including upvotes (1) and comments (2), was merged into this suggestion.
"Make the bots less retarded" (suggested by Wanda Tinasky on 2019-09-28), including upvotes (5) and comments (1), was merged into this suggestion.
Cleaning up old issues:http://prntscr.com/lka4h0 Nov 20, 2018http://prntscr.com/lq7qn4 Dec 4, 2018http://prntscr.com/lq7rv3 Dec 4, 2018http://prntscr.com/lq7sny Dec 4, 2018http://prntscr.com/lq7t0p Dec 4, 2018Bots sometimes build towards existing settlementsBot seems to make a road towards a good location, which is empty. But at 1 side there are other settlements so it is unbuildable.
While lengthening road, bot missed the opportunity to connect to itself http://prntscr.com/o7kxc8 http://prntscr.com/o7kzlvhttps://i.imgur.com/8pY1jOK.pnghttps://imgur.com/j6bzxW0https://www.reddit.com/r/Katan/comments/cee93a/testing_v43/eufbvqh/https://github.com/colonistio/katan/issues/182
"Bot's Road Placements" (suggested by Halnon on 2020-09-25), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
But it's also sad because the bots fail to block the right positions to slow the leader. Hey, let's block 3 ignoring the Bot has cities on 6 and 8 and those are rolling significantly more. Which is ironic because the bot seems to try and avoid blocking 4/10 when those are rolling off the hook. It's mindblowing... I have no idea the ruleset that leads to absurd plays
[And I'm only pointing out those low odd numbers as having inconsistent blocking rules around them. I sort of get that blocking low odd numbers is a low priority in the 4/10 case, sort of, but here it is blocking 3 when it's the worst choice. But hey, have to block 2 players right!? (unless it's a human player... then it's good to block only 1 person)]
"Bugs: Bot used monopoly, got 27 resource in hand, 9 points and had port... then only build roads" (suggested by john on 2020-09-25), including upvotes (1) and comments (2), was merged into this suggestion.
rather than just win... It's like it's going to keep doing stuff until it's forced to win or stumbles upon it. This is so absurd.
bot had 2 knights and has a third knight it refused to play until the end of it's turn, choosing to trade with the bank and build roads aimlessly... it's like it avoids winning at times
"Bot has longest road, largest army, 15+ resources in hand but just continues to screw around rather" (suggested by john on 2020-09-30), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
"BUG: Bot built road over settlement, loses road immediately" (suggested by player on 2019-12-21), including upvotes (1) and comments (1), was merged into this suggestion.
feels unfair to play with a bot who can win longest road but constructs it to nowhere. that plus too many "extra point cards" (two or more) has made me hold my moves in order to hace a nice match. (maybe it could be good to restrict those cards (to 1) when playing against machines as the length of matches is sustantially shortened for this.)
I've noticed this too. Bots seem to spend a lot of resources on pointless roads, even if it is (a) impossible for it to get to any available settlement sites or (b) become Longest Road. It is almost behaving as if it doesn't realise that settlements 'interrupt' the longest road calculation.
In general, the bots are very bad players. However, the following three items would vastly improve their skill level. 1) the bots build roads into dead-ends. It's incredibly stupid. Even when they could be opening up new intersections to build on, they build a road to into a dead intersection. This has to be fixed. 2) the bots will trade with anyone, at any time. The simplest rule should be the following. In a game to X, the bot does not trade with any player who has a score greater than X-2 - (number of hidden DEV cards). So for example, in a game to 10, if a player is on 7 and has 2 dev cards, then the bot will go 10-2-2 = 6, the score 7>6 so no trades with that player. This could be implemented in 3 minutes. 3) When placing the robber, the bot needs to factor in both largest army and longest road possibilities and hidden dev cards into it's calculation about who is winning. At the moment it just goes on points. I will detail this below.
Regarding point 3 above. The opponents scores should be evaluated as following before placing the robber1a) ) their visible pointsb) the distance a player is from largest armyc) the number of roads needed to make longest roadb) can be calculated as follows. N is the number of knights needed to get largest army (3 at the start of the game, it goes up later) X is the number of robbers a player has played. Y is the number of hidden dev cards a player has and Z is the number of hidden dev cards the player with the largest army has (will be zero if no-one has the army yet). About half the dev cards are Knights. b = 2vp * (X + (Y-Z)/2)/NExamples a) a Player has played 2 knights and has 1 hidden dev card and no-one has the robber. X = 2. N= 3. Y = 1. Z = 0 b = 2vp * 2.5/3 = 1.66 i.e. almost 2vp. Example b) a player has played 2 knights, and has 1 hidden dev card, someone already has the largest army and also has a hidden dev card X= 2 N=4 Y =1 and Z = 1. b = 2vp * (2/4) = 1vp
"Bug - bot builds upon roads that have breaks" (suggested by Giselle on 2020-12-28), including upvotes (2) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
the bots don't seem to try to win, actually. i just played a bot game with a 40 card discard limit. the bots hardly built anything! they just hung out with 30+ cards in their hands and did nothing. (2 of them upgraded their initial settlements to cities and built a couple roads. 1 of them built a bunch of roads, then did nothing for like 10 turns, then suddenly built a bunch of roads and a couple settlements.) so it seems the bots are just trying to play cards before a 7 rolls. and they're not trying to maximize points
0 / 1,000
* Your name will be publicly visible
* Your email will be visible only to moderators
This feedback board is powered by Feature Upvote.
When submitting your email with a suggestion or comment, Feature Upvote uses your email to
Your email is never displayed to other users. Colonist.io staff will be able to see your email address.
We’ll email you when the status of the suggestion changes. You can unsubscribe at any time with a single click.
* Comments and upvotes from this suggestion will be moved to another suggestion.
You cannot undo changes once they're done.
Edit the selected suggestion and create a new one.
Comments and upvotes will also be moved.