Filter Profile Stats: bot games, game modes, maps, etc.
When I was first starting out, I played with bots to get a feel for the UI and understand the game better. But now I realize the bots are easier to trick and wins against them don't feel as genuine as wins against real opponents. I think having the ability to filter out the bots when calculating my profile's win % would help me understand better how I am doing.
Comments: 16
-
27 Mar, '20
bjaki MergedAny somewhat decent player will currently win their games against the bots as the AI doesn't play very sophisticated yet. In my opinion this falsifies the statistics.
In order to know how well a player plays against other real players, I think there should be an option to see the statistics without games in which that player played against bots only. -
06 May, '20
Hawkaberi MergedThis 100%! Any game that is started with a bot should not count towards the same statistics as "normal games". I believe that the statistics shown on a players profile should only include "normal games".
-
18 May, '20
Wystery MergedPlease remove bot games from stats on profiles or add another page without bot games factored in.
-
06 Sep, '20
JUAN Admin"Option to show statistics without games involving bots" (suggested by bjaki on 2020-03-27), including upvotes (7) and comments (1), was merged into this suggestion.
-
02 Nov, '20
OnTheBrinkMN MergedRight now there is a general win-percentage. I'd like to see a break-down of this percentage for the different board-types and number of players. For example: I only play 4 player base games and like to check other players profiles for their ability. Win-percentage on a certain type of Catan-board/player count would give me some information what their abilities are
-
14 Nov, '20
JUAN Admin"Win percentage breakdown" (suggested by OnTheBrinkMN on 2020-11-02), including upvotes (2) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
-
16 Nov, '20
Jacob Mergedi totally agree, i play bot games for a variety of reasons (practice strategy/placements, short on time, multi-tasking) and i would love to have the option to see my real stats without those games included
-
23 Nov, '20
Fromper MergedAgreed. I only want my stats for games vs people. Or maybe include separate stats for bot only games.
-
23 Nov, '20
JUAN Admin"Bot games shouldn't count towards stats" (suggested by Wystery on 2020-05-18), including upvotes (11) and comments (2), was merged into this suggestion.
-
02 Dec, '20
MJ MergedI want to be able to only see my record in the base game in the classic map. Or for others, it could be different. I would be able to tell what kind of game mode I'm better at and I do play different mode for fun but I do go hard in the standard game mode.
-
03 Dec, '20
JUAN Admin"Player record system ( like able to only get personal stats for certain game type)" (suggested by MJ on 2020-12-02), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
-
14 Dec, '20
Alistair H MergedFor some things on discord you need a good win record and it is annoying that bots games get counted in that, there should be a separate or no bot stats.
-
14 Dec, '20
JUAN Admin"Bots games should be a separate part of stats" (suggested by Alistair H on 2020-12-14), including upvotes (2) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
-
04 Nov, '21
JUAN Admin"Divide stats in player profile based on type of game" (suggested by GPShorts on 2021-11-02), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
-
05 Aug, '22
SillyWordsHi, I'd like to add some meat to this suggestion. Currently 05.08.22 the profile stats offer little information regarding a players strength. The win% does not take into account how many players are playing, so a person playing 6player all the time is disadvantaged. The "points per game" stat is also corrupted when you play games that go to 12. So a person playing Perhaps "points" is important, but I have no idea how "Points" are calculated and empirically I don't see much of a correlation between win% and higher points. For example, I compared the player Teags#1234 to myself. I had 37% win rate but Teags only had 28%, despite playing a bunch of two player games, and yet Teags was rated at 814 and I at 776.
to be continued. -
05 Aug, '22
SillyWordsI would like to suggest the following improvement for the stats to give a better indication of strength.
1) Average points should be (or should mean) "average % of game points". If you are playing a game to 10 and get 10 you get 100%. If you get 8 out of 10 you get 80%. If you get 9 out of 12, the it's 75%. If you get 11/10 (possible with army/road), then you get 100% for reaching 10.
2) Implement a proper ELO based on the strength for the opponents. Each 4 player match is evaluated, as 3 individual ranking events. Player A vs players B, C, D. If you come 2nd, then you are evaluated for the ELO as if you beat C and D, but lost to B.