BUG: 3:1 trade with no port (fun maps)
We played 3 human players on map clover-3. one human player had a settlement on top left side of the top 9 field (the center one on the top leaf), one on botten right side of the lower left 9 field (the center one on the left leaf). After having built an additional road, no additional settlement, and having nothing even near a 3-1 port, he noticed that he could not trade 4-1 with the bank, but COULD trade 3-1 with the bank. this continued throughout the game for any 3-1 trade he tried, even though he never reached a 3-1 port. (There was only one 3-1 port anyway). The other players were only able to trade the usual 4-1 with bank.
Comments: 7
-
26 Jul, '20
Monopoly Guy MergedIn some maps like Valentine, it randomly switched a player to 3-1 port usage but there is no 3-1 port on the map.
-
26 Jul, '20
SetAU1yep i am in the game, guy trading 3 for 1 on no port. Map is Clover3
-
15 Aug, '20
Satoshi Admin"Bug in ports.. randomly giving 3 - 1 port usage" (suggested by Monopoly Guy on 2020-07-26), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
-
20 Aug, '20
IwannaRock Admin"Bug report: 3-1 port capability present since start of game without actually having such a port" (suggested by jahnitu on 2020-08-09), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
-
20 Aug, '20
IwannaRock Admin"Had access to 3 for 1 trade without being on port" (suggested by Chase Noel on 2020-07-26), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.
-
12 Oct, '20
knux400 MergedMe and my family were playing on the Valentine's map (free map of the week currently) and MisterFlask was able to do 3-for-1 trades despite not being on a 3-for-1 port, and no port of that kind existing anywhere on the map. Our theory is that the sheep ports on the lower sides of the map are somehow counted as 3-for-1 ports, since later in the game another player was able to make the same kind of trade using the port on the opposite side.
-
12 Oct, '20
JUAN Admin"Nonexistent 3-for-1 port?" (suggested by knux400 on 2020-10-12), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.